<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Ideas are Interactive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/11/our-ideas-are-interactive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/11/our-ideas-are-interactive/</link>
	<description>Standing on the verge of a technologically educational revolution.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:13:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: monika hardy</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/11/our-ideas-are-interactive/comment-page-1/#comment-4662</link>
		<dc:creator>monika hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=273#comment-4662</guid>
		<description>i have my web class do it. i love it - and so do they.

we have prom boards and used clickers last year in the same way - they could text in any questions. 
the kids find the chat on our ning more natural. i can keep glancing at it - or one of them lets me know if i should stop and look at it.
it also helps after class - i can catch some thinking i missed.
either way - they feel they have more of a voice - and i feel i have more of an idea where they are in their thinking at any given moment.

i&#039;m thinking it works better in small groups like the classroom. not so cafeteria-ish maybe.

i just think it&#039;s another case of how they&#039;re wired. and something we need to tap into if we want to grow with them.

it&#039;s unsettling that they can be talking about you - or off task (there&#039;s private chat option) - but only if the classroom has that tendency anyway. 

i need to go read your student&#039;s post.
thanks ben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have my web class do it. i love it &#8211; and so do they.</p>
<p>we have prom boards and used clickers last year in the same way &#8211; they could text in any questions.<br />
the kids find the chat on our ning more natural. i can keep glancing at it &#8211; or one of them lets me know if i should stop and look at it.<br />
it also helps after class &#8211; i can catch some thinking i missed.<br />
either way &#8211; they feel they have more of a voice &#8211; and i feel i have more of an idea where they are in their thinking at any given moment.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m thinking it works better in small groups like the classroom. not so cafeteria-ish maybe.</p>
<p>i just think it&#8217;s another case of how they&#8217;re wired. and something we need to tap into if we want to grow with them.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s unsettling that they can be talking about you &#8211; or off task (there&#8217;s private chat option) &#8211; but only if the classroom has that tendency anyway. </p>
<p>i need to go read your student&#8217;s post.<br />
thanks ben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Shareski</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/11/our-ideas-are-interactive/comment-page-1/#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Shareski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=273#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>My sense is that like so many things happening with social media, we&#039;re still in the infancy stage. We sense, as you do there it can work but lack the structure and parameters that make it useful. Combined is this desire for &quot;openness and transparency&quot; which while offer some empowering uses, also come with complicated side effects and outcomes.

It reminds me of the promise of cooperative groups. I remember learning about this strategy in my pre-service days and even in my early years of teaching. It&#039;s almost guaranteed that the first few times you try it, it fails miserably. Kids are off task, you feel out of control and you question the overall learning. You might try it another time with mixed results. It&#039;s not until it becomes part of the culture of your classroom, does it begin to pay dividends. 

As you say, there is something to it. We&#039;re all just trying to get it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sense is that like so many things happening with social media, we&#8217;re still in the infancy stage. We sense, as you do there it can work but lack the structure and parameters that make it useful. Combined is this desire for &#8220;openness and transparency&#8221; which while offer some empowering uses, also come with complicated side effects and outcomes.</p>
<p>It reminds me of the promise of cooperative groups. I remember learning about this strategy in my pre-service days and even in my early years of teaching. It&#8217;s almost guaranteed that the first few times you try it, it fails miserably. Kids are off task, you feel out of control and you question the overall learning. You might try it another time with mixed results. It&#8217;s not until it becomes part of the culture of your classroom, does it begin to pay dividends. </p>
<p>As you say, there is something to it. We&#8217;re all just trying to get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
