<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Online Identity Crisis of Sorts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/</link>
	<description>Standing on the verge of a technologically educational revolution.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:13:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate everyone&#039;s comments about this topic.  Much of what Ben writes I don&#039;t understand.  This time I only had to look up a few words.  I am one of those people that likes to be myself no matter what arena I am in.  I hold back from time to time so as not to embarrass my wife or offend others, but I echo what has already been stated,  &quot;I am who I am.&quot;  To me it really comes down to a minor difference, I can expose who I am without imposing that on others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate everyone&#8217;s comments about this topic.  Much of what Ben writes I don&#8217;t understand.  This time I only had to look up a few words.  I am one of those people that likes to be myself no matter what arena I am in.  I hold back from time to time so as not to embarrass my wife or offend others, but I echo what has already been stated,  &#8220;I am who I am.&#8221;  To me it really comes down to a minor difference, I can expose who I am without imposing that on others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb in Nebraska</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb in Nebraska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-613</guid>
		<description>I can understand a desire to have 2 accounts. But I tweet about Catholic stuff and I tweet about educational stuff. After all, I am a Catholic school teacher. And that&#039;s what I am. 

Here&#039;s a plug for a podcasting priest in the Netherlands, Fr. Roderick is his name. He runs the network. SQPN.com His network reaches lots of people through new media with Ustream, podcasts, video podcasts and various social networking sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand a desire to have 2 accounts. But I tweet about Catholic stuff and I tweet about educational stuff. After all, I am a Catholic school teacher. And that&#8217;s what I am. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a plug for a podcasting priest in the Netherlands, Fr. Roderick is his name. He runs the network. SQPN.com His network reaches lots of people through new media with Ustream, podcasts, video podcasts and various social networking sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandy</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>mandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-612</guid>
		<description>I agree with Doug that technology can be distracting to people in church, but if the church started thinking, &quot;How can we reach people through technology?&quot; their message might go further. I can talk to people all over the world with Twitter and yet, I have a hard time telling my neighbor what went on in church because I never see them. What a way to reach people! I am hoping to be able to start more of a ministry with technology in my church- such as Ustreaming the broadcast and having the pastor Twitter his message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Doug that technology can be distracting to people in church, but if the church started thinking, &#8220;How can we reach people through technology?&#8221; their message might go further. I can talk to people all over the world with Twitter and yet, I have a hard time telling my neighbor what went on in church because I never see them. What a way to reach people! I am hoping to be able to start more of a ministry with technology in my church- such as Ustreaming the broadcast and having the pastor Twitter his message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skambalu</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>skambalu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-610</guid>
		<description>Have found this an interesting conversation. I keep my Facebook account for friends, but Twitter straddles that fine line between professional and personal. I use it primarily as a professional tool, and I generally follow teachers and others in education; however, I also twitter random stream of consciousness thoughts as well, and enjoy the little excursions into the personal lives of others. 

I&#039;ve been intrigued today to discover just how many of the people I follow, and have never met, are churchgoers. I tend not to write about my own faith (I think perhaps being an RE teacher means that while I am very happy to twitter about anything religious, I am also conscious that sharing my own faith in education is a very sensitive area!). However, I also had an interesting experience earlier this week where someone was confused about the fact I mentioned going to church because he thought that I had elsewhere been open about my lack of mainstream belief - turns out he got me confused with my husband, who also twitters but in a very different way and under a very different username.

Finally, twittering in church. Or anything else involving mobiles in church, for that matter. Every week I read the little blurb in the church newsletter: &quot;As you enter the church there is a sign which tells all to switch off all MOBILE PHONES. This means that they are not switched on until you leave the church. I have noticed in recent weeks that some people have been talking on a mobile phone before leaving the church. Can I ask those who do this to stop, as this is a House of Prayer where people come to pray and not to have a conversation on a mobile phone that they can have outside the church and preferably in public.&quot; In fact, this week it was mentioned twice. I&#039;m not so sure about whether this is related to our approach to technology in worship as to our approach to prayer and spending time with God ... I tweeted on the way to church and when I came out of church today, and would have loved to have recorded parts of the service today (blessing of the palms and entrance to church particularly beautiful), but surely then my mind is not entirely on God?

Definitely a lot to discuss and think about - sorry if I&#039;ve gone on a bit, think this is my longest comment ever on a blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have found this an interesting conversation. I keep my Facebook account for friends, but Twitter straddles that fine line between professional and personal. I use it primarily as a professional tool, and I generally follow teachers and others in education; however, I also twitter random stream of consciousness thoughts as well, and enjoy the little excursions into the personal lives of others. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been intrigued today to discover just how many of the people I follow, and have never met, are churchgoers. I tend not to write about my own faith (I think perhaps being an RE teacher means that while I am very happy to twitter about anything religious, I am also conscious that sharing my own faith in education is a very sensitive area!). However, I also had an interesting experience earlier this week where someone was confused about the fact I mentioned going to church because he thought that I had elsewhere been open about my lack of mainstream belief &#8211; turns out he got me confused with my husband, who also twitters but in a very different way and under a very different username.</p>
<p>Finally, twittering in church. Or anything else involving mobiles in church, for that matter. Every week I read the little blurb in the church newsletter: &#8220;As you enter the church there is a sign which tells all to switch off all MOBILE PHONES. This means that they are not switched on until you leave the church. I have noticed in recent weeks that some people have been talking on a mobile phone before leaving the church. Can I ask those who do this to stop, as this is a House of Prayer where people come to pray and not to have a conversation on a mobile phone that they can have outside the church and preferably in public.&#8221; In fact, this week it was mentioned twice. I&#8217;m not so sure about whether this is related to our approach to technology in worship as to our approach to prayer and spending time with God &#8230; I tweeted on the way to church and when I came out of church today, and would have loved to have recorded parts of the service today (blessing of the palms and entrance to church particularly beautiful), but surely then my mind is not entirely on God?</p>
<p>Definitely a lot to discuss and think about &#8211; sorry if I&#8217;ve gone on a bit, think this is my longest comment ever on a blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Belshaw</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Belshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-609</guid>
		<description>Ben, absolutely! I&#039;m doug_belshaw on Skype. :-)

BTW, is it possible for you to install a plugin on this blog, or use &lt;a href=&quot;http://disqus.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Disqus&lt;/a&gt; so that comment authors get notified when people reply to them please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, absolutely! I&#8217;m doug_belshaw on Skype. <img src='http://bengrey.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW, is it possible for you to install a plugin on this blog, or use <a href="http://disqus.com" rel="nofollow">Disqus</a> so that comment authors get notified when people reply to them please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Grey</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Dan- I think that is where many people are drawing their lines of demarcation with their social networks.  Facebook is more social, Twitter is used more to connect with other professionals.  I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s the way it will always be, especially with more and more people joining Twitter now, but it seems that&#039;s been the organic breakdown thus far.

Thomas- I agree with you 100% about TweetDeck making Twitter entirely more functional and palatable as your network grows.  Some people are averse to using a separate client for Twitter, but I think it has made all the difference for me.

Kelly- I&#039;m honored, and most certainly the greater beneficiary for being &quot;stuck with you.&quot;  Glad to have you as one of my incredibly valuable resources.

Ann- Thanks for the follow.  I have added you to my network and am glad to already be learning from you.  I do believe the technology in church discussion is an important one that should be had in the near future.

Dean- Very nice perennial herbaceous reference.  The article does a nice job of detailing how social networks are bringing us back to a place of community we&#039;ve not had for a long, long time.  Very interesting read.

Matt- I will encourage your parents to join and friend you next time I see them in church.

Scott-  And that is the power of networks like Twitter.  We can all shape the stream we follow as we see fit.  It does make it tough, however, if we want to share things at the risk of losing people in our network we value.  I think there&#039;s still a lot to be worked out in this new world.

Doug-  That was exactly the conversation my wife and I had later that Sunday afternoon.  I would love to have a longer conversation about this as I believe it is directly related to our approach to technology in education as well.  Let me know if you want to chat about it some time.  There&#039;s a lot to discuss here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan- I think that is where many people are drawing their lines of demarcation with their social networks.  Facebook is more social, Twitter is used more to connect with other professionals.  I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s the way it will always be, especially with more and more people joining Twitter now, but it seems that&#8217;s been the organic breakdown thus far.</p>
<p>Thomas- I agree with you 100% about TweetDeck making Twitter entirely more functional and palatable as your network grows.  Some people are averse to using a separate client for Twitter, but I think it has made all the difference for me.</p>
<p>Kelly- I&#8217;m honored, and most certainly the greater beneficiary for being &#8220;stuck with you.&#8221;  Glad to have you as one of my incredibly valuable resources.</p>
<p>Ann- Thanks for the follow.  I have added you to my network and am glad to already be learning from you.  I do believe the technology in church discussion is an important one that should be had in the near future.</p>
<p>Dean- Very nice perennial herbaceous reference.  The article does a nice job of detailing how social networks are bringing us back to a place of community we&#8217;ve not had for a long, long time.  Very interesting read.</p>
<p>Matt- I will encourage your parents to join and friend you next time I see them in church.</p>
<p>Scott-  And that is the power of networks like Twitter.  We can all shape the stream we follow as we see fit.  It does make it tough, however, if we want to share things at the risk of losing people in our network we value.  I think there&#8217;s still a lot to be worked out in this new world.</p>
<p>Doug-  That was exactly the conversation my wife and I had later that Sunday afternoon.  I would love to have a longer conversation about this as I believe it is directly related to our approach to technology in education as well.  Let me know if you want to chat about it some time.  There&#8217;s a lot to discuss here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Belshaw</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Belshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-607</guid>
		<description>I remembered your tweets when I was in church myself today. My wife and child are at the in-laws whilst I get some work done, so I was at church by myself. I didn&#039;t use the Bible reader on my phone. Why? People would think I was texting. 

Whilst I think attitudes towards the above need to change, I&#039;m *not* of the opinion that things like Twitter have a place in church services - at least not your average church service. I think that it would distract from the whole reason you go there in the first place...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembered your tweets when I was in church myself today. My wife and child are at the in-laws whilst I get some work done, so I was at church by myself. I didn&#8217;t use the Bible reader on my phone. Why? People would think I was texting. </p>
<p>Whilst I think attitudes towards the above need to change, I&#8217;m *not* of the opinion that things like Twitter have a place in church services &#8211; at least not your average church service. I think that it would distract from the whole reason you go there in the first place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Meech</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Meech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-588</guid>
		<description>The tolerance for following someone within Twitter and other social networks is closely related to their appreciation of that person and the activities they have in common. I wouldn&#039;t unfollow you because I know you well enough and you have become an important part of my PLN.  However, if a member of my network with whom I don&#039;t know well began pushing out  information unrelated to what I find interesting and important, than yes I can see unfollowing them.  This would have nothing to do with the subject matter (unless it was crass and inappropriate) per se.  

I look at this as a return on investment issue.  We have a finite amount of time to learn and work.  If someone isn&#039;t giving me a good return on my attention investment, than I would need to cut my expensives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tolerance for following someone within Twitter and other social networks is closely related to their appreciation of that person and the activities they have in common. I wouldn&#8217;t unfollow you because I know you well enough and you have become an important part of my PLN.  However, if a member of my network with whom I don&#8217;t know well began pushing out  information unrelated to what I find interesting and important, than yes I can see unfollowing them.  This would have nothing to do with the subject matter (unless it was crass and inappropriate) per se.  </p>
<p>I look at this as a return on investment issue.  We have a finite amount of time to learn and work.  If someone isn&#8217;t giving me a good return on my attention investment, than I would need to cut my expensives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt T</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-584</guid>
		<description>I have been wondering what I will do when my parents inevitably join facebook...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been wondering what I will do when my parents inevitably join facebook&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean  Shareski</title>
		<link>http://bengrey.com/blog/2009/03/an-online-identity-crisis-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean  Shareski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=101#comment-582</guid>
		<description>If you haven&#039;t read this, you should:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html

I have no intention of setting up 2 accounts. I yam what I yam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t read this, you should:<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html</a></p>
<p>I have no intention of setting up 2 accounts. I yam what I yam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
